Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been achieved, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution might be justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears and also a new system is place in its place.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents from the boy or Lady tend not to approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they're able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy who's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by law.

The a lot of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it truly is made crystal clear that police is free to acquire action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. When the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-subject duties inside the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed on the disposal of the instant petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and private respondents and will just take care of all the components of the case and make certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

Generally speaking, higher courts do not have direct oversight over the lessen courts of record, in that they cannot achieve out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments from the lessen courts.

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, more info litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it's easy for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to help make an attempt to get rid of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got achieved to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's got attained these types of stage. Read more

In certain jurisdictions, case law is often applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.

Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, aiding you in understanding the intricacies of land and property regulation.

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

ten. Based within the findings in the inquiry committee, this petition just isn't viewed as maintainable and is therefore liable to generally be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.